Download Free The Twilight Saga: New Moon

I can't even begin to describe how disappointed I was with this film.
The acting was horrible, the storyline was pieced together, and it was
just plain boring. I've read the books and enjoyed them. I was excited
to see the movie. I'm so sorry I spent the money to go see it.

The only reason I think it got so much enthusiasm was because of the
teenage girls gushing about Taylor Laudner's bare chest throughout the
movie. If it wasn't for frequency of that, I think even they might have
noticed how bad the film was.

Don't expect to see me in line to watch the next two installments of
Twilight..

what an incredible movie:).

enjoyd this movie completely.

awesome .

planet lovve.

superb.

thriiling.

good movie..

takers was a great movie.

hi.

Seriously, why does Emmerich even bother casting actors? Just show stuff blowing up. That's all he cares about. Watching this is like seeing any number of faceless human traits and personalities in human skin. There's not a shred of acting going on here, because everyone has a one-line definition of who their character is and what he does. John Cusack? Writer and terrible dad. Woody Harrelson? Crazy government conspiracy cook. Danny Glover? Selfless president. Chiwetel Ejiofor? Intelligent scientist with all the answers. Roland, next time, just blow stuff up. Save the money you'd be paying actors and just blow more stuff up..

I have to admit, as an adult woman, I read the entire "Twilight"
series. I am not obsessed by it -- but it was a fun, escapist read,
even though I still have some reservations about the obsessive nature
of love as depicted in these books.

"New Moon" was better, production-wise, than "Twilight" (I know, damned
by faint praise.) But does Kristin Stewart have more than two
expressions? She alternates between a vacant stare that is meant to
denote intensity, and a stare with a tiny frown between her eyes that
denotes distress. She speaks in a monotone and slouches around when
she's not curled up in a fetal position, leaving one to wonder -- what
exactly does Edward see in this girl, anyway? And Robert Pattinson --
He reminds me of "The Look" that Ben Stiller "perfected" in "Zoolander"
-- i.e., a dozen looks, and they all look precisely alike. He can, at
least, scowl nicely -- and as a result, tends to overuse it. Basically,
though -- he can't act. This is a man who is meant to be burning with
passion, and the only thing I can focus on is "what god-awful shade of
lipstick did they put on that boy?" The rest of the Cullens got short
shrift in this movie, with only token appearances. Jacob's
transformations were never fully explained in the movie -- unless you
have read the book, you have NO idea what in the heck he's talking
about, much less why. I have to wonder how often he practiced whipping
off his shirt to help Bella when she hits her head - it was pretty
practiced, and obviously self-conscious, as if he could just hear the
squeals of the teenagers in the theatre as he did it. But at least
Taylor Lautner was allowed to show a certain engaging charm. Dakota
Fanning as Jane looked good in amber contacts, but her role was
extremely brief, and basically consisted of staring and marching around
in odd Mary Jane-style shoes. Michael Sheen was rather intriguing as
Aro, and actually came closest to my mental image of the characters.

Towards the end of the movie, the editing got pretty sloppy. The
transitions were abrupt and, again, if you hadn't read the book, you'd
be wondering where in the hell the yellow Porsche came from. The
transition from Italy to Forks was possibly the most abrupt, and failed
to re-establish the connection between Bella and Edward.

The book has enough faults of its own in character development -- I
guess it's too much to hope that a movie would be able to correct those
faults..