Not bad, but not great
Land of the Dead - The 4th part of George A. Romero's zombie
quadrillogy. It's been decades since the dead began to walk the Earth, and now they practically own it (except for Canada for some reason). There is one last little mega-city that is surrounded by electric fences, armed patrols and barbed wire on one side, and nothing but water on all other four sides, because the dead supposedly don't like water. Despite the fact that the surrounding lands are rife with zombies, this metropolis is incredibly corrupt. All thanks to evil bureaucrat Kaufman (Dennis Hooper, who I had a ball watching) who makes all but a select few rich folks (who have never seen or fought a real zombie) live in slums. There you can get your picture taken with zombies, or watch zombie fights (they fight over animals and the occasional human). There are a few mercenaries paid to make runs in a giant tank truck for precious commodities in the outside world. Now I like George and could thank him endlessly for starting the zombie franchise, but he has always favored gore just a little more over character development, and has always liked his zombies just a LOT more than his humans. Heck in this movie, the zombies are practically the good-guys! They're just like you and me, except they rip people's arms in two (and I do mean length-wise) and tear belly button rings out of people. They are actually pretty intelligent and moderately fast at walking. By far the biggest threats in Romero's movies (most notably "Big Daddy" (Eugene Clark). For the most part though, it works, and it's good gory fun. Except the character development thingy. While I don't begrudge Romero for having fun with his zombies, I wasn't too sympathetic to Riley (Simon Baker) or Slack (Asia Argento). Riley, like Romero it seems, is just tired of character development as he has Riley say "I'm fed up with back-stories". But Riley dear boy, that's how the audience grows to care about you. Slack almost kills several of her fellow team-mates and does not grow at all, but that's the script's fault. Both of these characters, however are played well for what the actors are given. Surprisingly the secondary characters are far more endearing. Cholo (John Leguizamo) was not only believable as a merc, but I was quite sympathetic to him as he realized that he was a pon. "Pilsbury" (Pedro Miguel Arce) and Charlie (Robert Joy) are endearing and funny. So the effects are good. The story is iffy. The acting is good. The character development is iffy. The ending is really lame. This gets an overall B. sayan watch The Bodyguard movie
thainkyou very much.
sayan watch Phoenix movie
thankyou very much.
jay107 watch Big Trouble In Little China movie
easy & fast just how i like it..
24whatisup watch Be My Valentine, Charlie Brown movie
Wow that was so amazing violavt and coool at the same time
.
mohamadbanda@yahoo.ca watch Senior Skip Day movie
i can't wait to see this one as it is a good movie.
Julija T
At the beggining i thought it's gonna be bad, but then I changed my mind. Well in my opinion this movie is average..
stevensegal26@hotmail.com
Excellent zombie flick from the master of zombie horror movies..
Land of the dead indeed.
It's a sad, sad day for film-making in general when such a pile of
trite is put on a pedestal. Have films really become so mediocre that we are hailing rubbish as the new classics? Maybe it's not everyone, I'm being unfair. I can only surmise that those who felt this film to be a) a masterpiece or b) an good film by an stretch of the imagination are just extreme zombie aficionados who would wet their over sized pants upon the mentioning of anything to do with the genre of the walking dead. Romero is their hero after all. To me Night of the Living Dead is a classic; in many ways so is the original Dawn of the dead, but this film is just...well sad. Why? It's like finding out that a great singer songwriter from the seventies as now lost his voice and is unable to perform his own numbers anymore. Romero invented this genre and he should have quit while he still had respect. I had to walk out of this film after an excruciating hour waiting to see if it got better. Sadly I waited 60mins too long. Someone here mentioned that the acting was great all round. Huh? I don't know where these reviewers are from but I hope that they enjoy their visit to earth. The acting was terrible. The tension, suspense less. And the plot, boring. Only the gore was good (but so what). Avoid this like the plague!. |
Trailers: |

