Clint Eastwood must have not seen \"The Player\"
About half way through "True Crime", I realized that it had almost the
exact same plot as the proposed movie-within-a-movie in "The Player".
And while Robert Altman's film proposed a serious ending for this
possible film to raise questions about the state of affairs in the
United States, Clint Eastwood's movie has a predictable ending. Clint
went through a real low period in the late '90s ("Midnight in the
Garden of Good and Evil" apparently didn't even follow the book) before
rebounding in the 21st century ("Space Cowboys" was a good one!). I
recommend this one only if you want to hear James Woods's hostile
comment (it was a pretty funny one).
Also starring Isaiah Washington, Michael McKean and Lucy Liu..
FHjunior watch Sliding Doors movie
was nice, clint is getting old .
sara 123 watch Lord Of The Flies movie
ma to je super idemo dalje .
sara 123 watch Get Thrashed movie
warriorlove watch Deadwater movie
one of the best movie of clinteastwood..
vidboy 333 watch Bitch Slap movie
HI EXCELLENT MOVIE HAD THE VIDEO GREAT WATCH THANKS.
Clint Eastwood played an awesome role .
A distant relative of His Girl Friday, True Crime is about a reporter (Clint Eastwood) at the bottom of his career writing for a small news paper after botching a story. That's not his only problem, though. Steve (Eastwood) is a bit of an asshole. He lives for himself and his work, stopping to think about the.
True Crime (1999).
ce movies are awsome .
murdered, she asks Carter to cover for her, and his acquiescence gets him into immediate trouble with the police and an ambitious prosecutor. Carter, with the help of his lover Emek, starts hd off by someone's hired muscle. Can Carter figure out what happened or will he lose more than he realizes he has? Human behavior is a mystery. .
More character-based than thriller.
A story about a faded, jaded journalist (Clint) who starts to suspect
the man on death row he is supposed to be interviewing is in fact
innocent. Is he right? Will he get the evidence in time? I watched this
from the point of view of someone trying to write screenplays that can
be shot on a low budget. With that in mind, I was very impressed. The
movie makes good use of a small number of sets and a small cast. The
story is gripping enough. The characters are well developed. There was
never any doubt in my mind what would happen at the end, but it was
My one quibble would be the resolution - those last 3 or 4 minutes
right at the end. The rhythm of this seemed slightly out. I can't go
into details without giving the plot away. But let's face it, I could
guess what had actually happened at the climax of the movie. There was
no point in trying withholding the facts any longer. That just left us
with a slightly cheesy moment in the ending sequence.
However, this is a very watchable, if somewhat unremarkable movie.